$100
reward for help on looking at "blind spots"
Dan Martin MD is
seeking help in looking at "Blind Spots" in
his data base on literature needed for clinical decisions.
There is a US$100 reward for peer reviewed, published
articles that are abstracted in PubMed, which show statistically
significant difference in outcomes (pain, tenderness,
fertility, change in appearance or other outcomes) of
surgery or medical therapy based on histology that is
positive as compared with histology that is negative
for endometriosis.
Decisions on endometriosis therapy
are based on several definitions that are not always
related. This can lead to application of data based
on any appearance definition to patients who have a
specific appearance or a histologic definition.
a) This is not an evidence based or scientific based
approach.
b) It may lead to inappropriate therapy.
c ) A concentration on biopsy positive patients implies
that we can ignore or discount patients who have a laparoscopic
diagnosis of endometriosis but have histologically negative
biopsies.
There is a large body of literature on accuracy of
confirmation of endometriosis but not a corresponding
literature on histologic diagnosis of peritoneal and
pelvic abnormalities. This leads to:
a) Identification of psammoma bodies, endosalpingiosis,
Walthard Rests, low malignant potential tumor and other
pathology as endometriosis.
b) An assumption that if we think it is endometriosis
then other significant pathology is not present.
c) Possibly diagnosing cancer as endometriosis and not
doing biopsies.
The use of biopsy results is pleasing from a theoretical
level regarding accuracy. But there is no data to support
the theoretical use of biopsy results for patient management.
Dr Martin needs peer reviewed, published articles that
are abstracted in PubMed. These need to show statistically
significant difference in outcomes (pain, tenderness,
fertility, change in appearance or other outcomes) of
surgery or medical therapy based on histology that is
positive as compared with histology that is negative
for endometriosis.
There is a $100 reward to the first physician
to send any paper that is not listed on Dr Martin's
website (www.memfert.com/reward.htm).
There will be as many rewards as there are
papers.
Dr Martin also needs additional articles that study
endometriosis histology and include the histology for
both endometriosis and other lesions in the same article.
The only reward for those will be his thanks.
If the article is not in English, an English translation
of the abstract and of the statistical analysis is needed.
The citation for the articles and the names of those
who win the money will be posted on his website: www.memfert.com/reward.htm,
which also carries a list of papers already recognised.
>>
SUBMIT YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS/COMMENTS TO DR MARTIN
|